岗位能力对标
Anthropic

Data Scientist, Developer Productivity

San Francisco, CA、New York City, NY · 全职 · 算法与研究

岗位更新:2026-07-14资料抓取:2026-08-04查看原始招聘来源

需要对标的能力

AI 应用 · 人机协同大模型原理 · LLM 基础上下文工程 · 记忆管理Agent 工程 · Harness / 脚手架AI Infra · 推理部署评测 · Eval 方法论多模态 · AI 生图

岗位职责与要求

Anthropic’s mission is to create reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems. We want AI to be safe and beneficial for our users and for society as a whole. Our team is a quickly growing group of committed researchers, engineers, policy experts, and business leaders working together to build beneficial AI systems. About the role You'll partner with Developer Productivity engineering leadership to define what "developer productivity" means in an AI-first org and to set the strategy for how Anthropic measures, understands, and improves it. This is a space where the playbook doesn't exist yet: AI-assisted development is reshaping how engineers work faster than anyone can measure, and last quarter's answer is already suspect. You'll decide which questions are worth asking, build the evidence to answer them, and stay ready to revise when the ground shifts again. You'll own the data strategy end-to-end: which metrics earn the org's trust, which investments to push for, which assumptions to challenge — including your own. The space rewards people who hold conclusions loosely, instrument early, and update fast when the data disagrees with the narrative. This role sits at the intersection of data science, developer experience, and frontier AI, with Anthropic's own teams as your users. Key responsibilities · Lead ambiguous, high-stakes investigations where the question isn't yet well-formed — from "is Claude making engineers faster?" to "what does 'faster' even mean here?" · Treat findings as provisional in a space that changes month to month. Bias toward instrumenting first, collecting evidence broadly, and revising the team's priors as the picture sharpens · Partner with Developer Productivity engineering leadership to set the team's measurement and research agenda — what to study, what to build, what to stop · Define the metrics framework for developer productivity in an AI-augmented org, and drive its adoption as the basis for tooling and infrastructure investment decisions · Design and run experiments on internal tooling and workflow changes; build the causal evidence base for what actually moves productivity · Influence engineering, infrastructure, and product leadership with data. Push back when the data doesn't support the prevailing narrative, and say so plainly when it doesn't support yours either · Build the analytical foundations (pipelines, dashboards, models) yourself or through partners — staying hands-on and close to the work rather than directing from a distance Minimum qualifications · Experience writing production-quality SQL and Python (or a similar language) to build pipelines, dashboards, and models independently · Experience serving as the primary data or analytics voice in a space where the questions weren't yet well-defined, and helping define them · A track record of holding conclusions loosely — favoring instrumentation and evidence-gathering over defending a prior position, and revising views in public when the evidence warrants it · Experience shaping what an engineering or product team worked on, not only measuring what they shipped — being consulted before a decision was made, not just after · Genuine interest in how AI is changing the way software gets built, with some firsthand experience grappling with the harder, less-defined parts of that question · Comfort presenting data-backed conclusions to a room of engineers, including when that means saying a built feature isn't moving the needle Preferred qualifications · 8+ years of hands-on data science experience, ideally in infrastructure, performance, or platform contexts · Direct experience with developer productivity, developer experience, or internal tooling, at any scale · Experience measuring the adoption or impact of AI-assisted workflows, or other tooling where the ground truth was contested · A track record of building an experimentation or causal-inference practice in an org that didn't already have one · Prior staff-level or tech-lead scope: setting direction for other ICs and owning a domain's data strategy end to end For sales roles, the range provided is the role’s On Target Earnings ("OTE") range, meaning that the range includes both the sales commissions/sales bonuses target and annual base salary for the role. Annual Salary: $380,000—$460,000 USD Logistics Minimum education: Bachelor’s degree or an equivalent combination of education, training, and/or experience Required field of study: A field relevant to the role as demonstrated through coursework, training, or professional experience Minimum years of experience: Years of experience required will correlate with the internal job level requirements for the position We believe that the highest-impact AI research will be big science. At Anthropic we work as a single cohesive team on just a few large-scale research efforts. And we value impact — advancing our long-term goals of steerable, trustworthy AI — rather than work on smaller and more specific puzzles. We view AI research as an empirical science, which has as much in common with physics and biology as with traditional efforts in computer science. We're an extremely collaborative group, and we host frequent research discussions to ensure that we are pursuing the highest-impact work at any given time. As such, we greatly value communication skills. The easiest way to understand our research directions is to read our recent research. This research continues many of the directions our team worked on prior to Anthropic, including: GPT-3, Circuit-Based Interpretability, Multimodal Neurons, Scaling Laws, AI & Compute, Concrete Problems in AI Safety, and Learning from Human Preferences.
查看中文参考译文
Anthropic 的使命是打造可靠、可解释、可引导的 AI 系统。我们希望 AI 对用户和整个社会都安全有益。我们的团队是一支快速成长的队伍,由专注的研究人员、工程师、政策专家和商业领袖组成,共同构建有益的 AI 系统。 About the role 你将与 Developer Productivity 工程领导层合作,定义在 AI-first 组织中"开发者生产力"的含义,并为 Anthropic 如何衡量、理解和改进它制定策略。这是一个 playbook 尚不存在的领域:AI-assisted development 正在重塑工程师的工作方式,其速度超过任何人的测量能力,而上个季度的答案已经值得怀疑。你将决定哪些问题值得追问,构建回答它们的证据,并在形势再次变化时随时准备修正。 你将端到端地拥有数据策略:哪些指标能赢得组织的信任,哪些投资值得推动,哪些假设需要挑战——包括你自己的。这个领域青睐那些对结论保持开放、尽早 instrument、在数据与叙事不符时快速更新的人。这个角色处于 data science、developer experience 和 frontier AI 的交汇点,Anthropic 自己的团队就是你的用户。 Key responsibilities · 领导模糊、高风险的调查,问题本身尚未成形——从"Claude 是否让工程师更快"到"这里的'更快'到底意味着什么" · 在每月都在变化的领域中将发现视为临时的。倾向于先 instrument,广泛收集证据,并在图景清晰时修正团队的 priors · 与 Developer Productivity 工程领导层合作,制定团队的测量和研究议程——研究什么、构建什么、停止什么 · 为 AI-augmented 组织中的开发者生产力定义 metrics framework,并推动其被采纳,作为 tooling 和 infrastructure 投资决策的基础 · 对内部 tooling 和 workflow 变更设计和运行实验;构建关于什么真正能提升生产力的因果证据基础 · 用数据影响工程、infrastructure 和产品领导层。当数据不支持主流叙事时提出质疑,当数据也不支持你自己的观点时 likewise 直言不讳 · 亲自或通过合作伙伴构建分析基础(pipelines、dashboards、models)——保持亲力亲为、贴近工作,而非远距离指挥 Minimum qualifications · 有编写 production-quality SQL 和 Python(或类似语言)的经验,能独立构建 pipelines、dashboards 和 models · 在问题尚未明确定义的领域担任主要数据或分析声音,并帮助定义它们的经验 · 有对结论保持开放的历史——倾向于 instrumentation 和证据收集,而非捍卫先前立场,并在证据支持时在公开场合修正观点 · 有塑造工程或产品团队工作内容的经验,不仅仅是衡量他们交付了什么——在决策前被咨询,而非仅在事后 · 对 AI 如何改变软件构建方式有真正的兴趣,并有一些 firsthand experience 来应对这个问题中更困难、定义更模糊的部分 · 能够自如地向一屋子工程师展示数据支持的结论,包括这意味着某个已构建的功能并未产生效果时 Preferred qualifications · 8 年以上 hands-on data science 经验,最好在 infrastructure、performance 或 platform 领域 · 有 developer productivity、developer experience 或 internal tooling 的直接经验,任何规模均可 · 有测量 AI-assisted workflows 或其他 ground truth 存在争议的 tooling 的采用或影响的经验 · 在尚未建立 experimentation 或 causal-inference practice 的组织中构建该实践的历史 · 此前的 staff-level 或 tech-lead 范围:为其他 ICs 设定方向,并端到端地拥有某个领域的数据策略 对于销售岗位,提供的范围是该岗位的 On Target Earnings ("OTE") 范围,意味着该范围包括销售佣金/销售奖金目标和该岗位的年度 base salary。 Annual Salary: $380,000—$460,000 USD Logistics Minimum education: 学士学位或同等的教育、培训和/或经验组合 Required field of study: 通过课程、培训或专业经验证明与该岗位相关的领域 Minimum years of experience: 所需经验年限将与该职位的内部 job level 要求相对应 我们相信,最高影响力的 AI 研究将是 big science。在 Anthropic,我们作为一个单一、有凝聚力的团队,仅专注于少数几个大规模研究项目。我们重视影响力——推进我们关于可引导、可信赖 AI 的长期目标——而非从事更小、更具体的 puzzle。我们将 AI 研究视为一门实证科学,它与物理学和生物学的共同点,与传统计算机科学努力一样多。我们是一个极度协作的群体,我们频繁举办研究讨论,以确保我们在任何给定时间都在追求最高影响力的工作。因此,我们非常重视沟通技能。 理解我们研究方向的最简单方式是阅读我们近期的研究。这项研究延续了我们团队在 Anthropic 之前工作的许多方向,包括:GPT-3、Circuit-Based Interpretability、Multimodal Neurons、Scaling Laws、AI & Compute、Concrete Problems in AI Safety 和 Learning from Human Preferences。

译文仅供辅助阅读,具体要求以原始招聘来源为准。